"The Transformation of Mia Farrow: Statistics of Time, Space and Becoming"
Installed with a flat screen video display of "Nessun Dorma: The Transformation of Mia Farrow", at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va 2009 Chalk, Chalkboard, Statistical Formula
Amelia Winger bearskin
Vanderbilt University
Department of Studio Art
Samuel C. Shaw
Vanderbilt University
Department of Sociology
Statistical formulas, diagrams, and hypotheses supplement the video by depicting Mia Farrow’s incoherence within a wider set of social patterns involving video blog testimonials, weight loss, genocide, and cultural diffusion.
According to followers of Farrow’s hunger strike (blogsphere), her aim was to generate public attention and support from President Obama to address the issue of genocide in Darfur by broadcasting via youtube daily updates about her weight loss, emotional condition, celebrity supporters, and the Dali Lama, among other things. Farrow’s hunger strike was to last twenty-two days to represent the twenty-two humanitarian aid organizations expelled from Darfur, but was courteously aborted after only twelve days per “doctor’s orders” to spare herself the possibility of a low blood-sugar coma. Despite the untimely compromise, Farrow’s purpose was nobly sustained by a loyal community of video blog supporters, whom by forming a chain of three-day fasts continued to broadcast the hunger strike via youtube. However, Farrow’s blogs also generated a host of video blog detractors who argued that Farrow did not know the first thing about Darfur, or that she was ugly, or annoying.
Diagrams, hypotheses, and statistical formulas offer a medium for making logical sense of this otherwise specious occasion; statistics illuminate patterns in a social world that might appear as a series of random events. The diagrams and formulas provided here do not represent real data. In fact they parody the logic of representing reality as data. In a sense they are absurd, capturing not the underlying social reality of Farrow’s transformation, but the absurdity of the event itself. A background in statistics is not necessary to decode these representations. The formulas use common statistical symbols, but the formulas themselves are made up; they make no logical sense. Nevertheless, the formulas and diagrams do suggest patterns. They are visual representations that capture, distort, and again give clarity to the social world in question.